Sunday, 31 May 2009

Fee rebate received from YourShare

I signed up with YourShare.com.au one year ago. Sure enough a cheque for just over $480 arrived last week, along with a comprehensive statement showing all the fees and commissions that YourShare had received from my nominated financial products. Having YourShare as the nominated 'adviser' on my loss of income insurance, margin loan accounts and managed fund investments has had no impact other than my receiving half of the commisions rebated to me. If the total annual fees and commissions eventually exceed $4,000 I'll get back 70% of the amount above $4,000.

There is another company that offers a similar fee rebate service, but it charges an annual fee, so it isn't as useful for investors with modest portfolios. Some financial planners (such as Count Wealth accountants) offer 100% rebate of the up-front application fee for managed funds, but they don't rebate any of the trailing fees (except in exceptional circumstances - Count did rebate the trail on my son's managed fund investment).

Overall I can recommend YourShare to any Australian investors that would like to get some of their trailing fees back each year. If you fill in the online application form, please consider inserting my reference ID: YS3442 on the form. If your rebate exceeds $250 I'll get a $50 referral bonus (paid from YourShare's part of your trailing fees).



Update: The founder of YourShare, Paul Brady, phoned me out of the blue to say thanks for the mention! He also pointed out that another major benefit of YourShare is that you get 100% of any upfront application fees rebated. While you can also get up-front fee rebates from some discount stockbrokers (eg. Commsec) and the Count Financial planner service, they don't rebate any of the ongoing trailing fees. YourShare also rebates the up-front fee for new insurance policies, which others don't offer. In fact, I'm in the process of getting some quotes for personal injury/accident insurance for myself and the kids via YourShare.

Subscribe to Enough Wealth. Copyright 2006-2008

Another tale of financial woe from a retired sports star

In yet another example that being a successful sports star doesn't mean you'll be set for life, Australian tennis star Mark Philippoussis (nick-named 'the scud' for his fast service), is at risk of losing the bay-side Melbourne house he shares with his mother after falling behind on the mortgage payments. One has to wonder why he would even have a $1.3 million mortgage, since the retired 32-year-old Davis Cup player earned more than $8 million on the court and millions more in sponsorships. His comments reveal that, like many young sports stars, he had acted as if his income during the peak earning years would last forever:

"Money came in left, right and centre; you just thought that's how it was for everyone and that's how it will always be," he said.

Perhaps the fundamental financial rule for such high-income, short working-life, sport stars should be "spend less than you'll earn ON AVERAGE during you lifetime". Saving 10% of a million dollar annual income could give a false sense of fiscal responsibility if you can only earn that much until you turn 30. Spending $900K per annum is profligate if you average annual income until 65 will be a much more modest $200K a year.

For us mere mortals, the lesson to take on board is that you can't count on your current income level lasting until retirement. Quite a large proportion of worker's will suffer long periods of un-employment or ill health - so we should ensure our financial plans allow for such set-backs, and include adequate amounts of insurance for illness, disability or loss of income.

Subscribe to Enough Wealth. Copyright 2006-2008

Wednesday, 27 May 2009

Me and the Rich 200 List

The SMH has a summary of the latest BRW "Rich 200" Australians List. Aside from the sad, sad news that the number of Australian billionaires has dropped from 38 last year to only 28 this year, my main interest in this story was to see how the GFC had affected the "cut off" to get on the list of 200 wealthiest Australians. Last year the cut off was A$200 million, whereas this year it had dropped to "only" A$150 million. A plot of my personal net worth vs. 1% of the Rich 200 cut off shows a remarkable correlation between my net worth and the amount of wealth required to make the BRW's list of the 200 Australians.

If anything, my NW was slowly creeping up on 1% of the "cut off" level (one of my long term targets) up until the onset of the GFC. Since then my NW may have dropped back relative to the cut off - although it's hard to be sure until next year's figures come out (the cut off figure is a bit rubbery and probably doesn't correspond exactly to 31 Dec each year). As a relatively large part of my annual net worth increase comes from saving a large proportion of my salary income, I suspect that my ROI is lower than the increase in the Rich 200 cut off. That's probably due to my asset allocation being overweight residential real estate compared to the asset allocation of the richest 200 Australians.



Subscribe to Enough Wealth. Copyright 2006-2009

Sunday, 24 May 2009

This and that

DS1 competed in his first Judo tournament today. There were only three competitors in his age/weight category, so he only had two 1.5 minute bouts - winning his first bout and losing the second in a close contest. The competition was held at a nice venue at the Sydney Olympic Park, and only cost $10. On the downside, weigh-in, getting organised, and the competition took four hours - so there was a lot of waiting around involved, which DS2 found boring after a while.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

DS1 had broken his clarinet (again) at the end of last term, so I gave him my clarinet to use for his practice and at school band. He managed to break the ligature on my clarinet after taking it to school for two weeks, so I had to buy a new ligature at the music store yesterday - $30 for a small bit of plastic strap and a thumbscrew! I keep threatening to deduct the repair costs from the money he earns busking with his recorder, but so far I haven't actually made him pay for anything. At nine years of age it seems a bit harsh to take money off him for being careless.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Centrelink has sent us a form to update our income estimate for the new financial year starting 1 July. Under the new rules any net investment losses (such as resulting from a negatively geared rental property or using a margin loan to invest in the stock market using borrowed funds and paying more interest charges than are received in dividends) are added back in when calculating "assessable income" to decide if/how much government benefit we should be paid. DWs income will rise slightly as her superannuation salary sacrifice will now be included in her assessed income. My income estimate will rise considerably under the new rules as I have negatively geared stock investments and make large pre-tax contributions into superannution (although next FY my salary sacrifice amount will be severly reduced under the new $25K cap on concessionally taxed superannuation contributions). We're unlikely to receive much in the way of Family Tax Benefit payments after 1 July, and I expect that will also mean we no longer get any childcare rebate. I have no idea how I can accurately estimate my income for 2009/10 before the 15 June deadline - our company doesn't even announce the pay rise for the new financial year until just before 30 June, and I have no way of knowing what stock dividend payment and margin loan interest payments will be next year. I'll probably just assume a 4% pay rise (the most we can expect without a promotion, based on the current AWE data) and that I have no net investment income. Any net loss from my geared share investment portfolio is likely to be offset by the net income from our rental property. If our estimated income turns out to be too low we will eventually have to repay any excess benefits we've received, which I'd prefer to avoid. On the other hand, overestimating income might result in us not receiving childcare benefits that we should be entitled to - as far as I know you have to claim childcare benefits within a few months of making a childcare payment, and any under-payment won't be "topped up" after our tax return is finalised in October 2010.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

As the recession continues to worsen in Australia, people at work are starting to wonder about their job security. With unemployment still around 5% and predicted to rise to around 8.5% in the next few years, odds are that most of us will probably be OK. However, you never know if your company will be one of those that slashes it's workforce, or goes out of business entirely, so everyone is understandably nervous. My immediate boss was retrenched last December, which left me as the only internal audit/QC resource with extensive knowledge of our systems and processes. Hopefully this makes my job somewhat secure - but you can never be certain.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The two main supermarket chains are slugging it out with competing rewards programs. Both Coles and Woolworths offer 4c/L fuel discount coupons if you spend more than $30 in one transaction. Woolworths had been sending occasional email offers of higher fuel discounts - for example a 15c/L discount if you spent $300 with them in one week. To counter this Coles has introduced a gift card offer for a limited period - if you spend over $30 in a transaction you accumulate points that count toward the value of gift card you will receive at the end of the promotion period. It's quite clever marketing as the cumulative value of the points, and the minimum required to be eligible for a gift card, means that many customers may prefer to shop at Coles instead of Woolworths during this promotion period.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I arranged the transfer of $500 each into the superannuation accounts of DS1 and DW (from their savings accounts). That brings their total personal, after-tax contributions into their super accounts to $1000 each this financial year. They should each be entitled to receive the government's $1500 co-contribution. I also contributed $1000 after-tax into my SMSF this year, but I probably won't get any co-contribution - I think salary sacrificed income is included when deciding if you're within the co-contribution cap.

Next year the co-contribution has been reduced to a maximum $1000 match if you contribute $1000 post-tax into superannuation (and are under the $38K cap for maximum co-contribution).

Subscribe to Enough Wealth. Copyright 2006-2008